Difference between revisions of "Research Snapshot"

From Scalable Game Design wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==='''Scalable Game Design Research Snapshot'''=== <br> Scalable Game Design (SGD) project at the University of Colorado at Boulder is in its 7th year conducting validated res...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 18:21, 5 February 2015

Scalable Game Design Research Snapshot

Scalable Game Design (SGD) project at the University of Colorado at Boulder is in its 7th year conducting validated research funded by National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (iTEST) program, Computer Education for the 21st Century (CE21) program, and Google for Education's Computer Science for High School (CS4HS) and RISE programs.

The MISSION of SGD project is to reinvent computer science and STEM education in public schools by:

  • creating and testing a computer science curriculum that impacts student’s motivation, performance, ownership, and engagement:
    • in all students including girls and under-represented populations
    • in a variety of locations including technical hub schools to remote rural schools and in the United States and beyond
    • taught by teachers trained in the curriculum by face to face, online, or blended (combining face to face and online) professional development
  • determining how instructional approaches influence:
    • student dispositions toward technology and computing education, including the likeliness to continue in computer science education
    • learning outcomes such as use of computational thinking patterns in different learning contexts

Who is Participating in Scalable Game Design Project?

The 2014 participation in research data collection was:

  • 60 schools and organizations
    • vast majority are public schools using the curriculum in classrooms
    • a few private schools
    • a few community based enrichment programs (e.g. after-school programs)
    • majority middle schools (ages 11 – 14), with an increasing number of high schools and elementary schools utilizing the curriculum

  • 71 classroom teachers
    • more than 158 teachers were exposed to Scalable Game Design, including research participants, events, conferences, outreach, camps, and workshops

  • 3,596 students participants in research
    • 40% girls (average participation for girls in K-12 computer science courses is <10%)
    • 52% non-white of which >20% Hispanic
    • 5,678 students: estimated total number of students who participated, including research participants and those who did not submit data

Cumulative participation between January 2012 and November 2014:

  • >200 teachers
  • >8,000 students
  • 20 states
    • California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, Wyoming
  • 6 countries
    • Brazil, Germany, Mexico, Slovakia, Switzerland, Thailand

Cumulative participation between 2009 and 2014 (estimated based on historical information):

  • >

Student Participation Beyond Research Implementation:

It is important to note that exposure to this project is not limited to those schools, teachers, and students that have submitted research data to-date. Collecting research parental consent forms are challenging, with return rates ranging from 10% to 90% of a class. All students participate in Scalable Game Design activities regardless of research consent, but data is used only for those with consent. Often teachers run out of time to administer the post-survey, which also decreases student research participation numbers even though they took part in all the curricular project activities.

Some of the instructors and organizations participate in SGD activities but not collecting data. Typically they have purchased software and use it but no longer collect data. Another sub-group introduces students to the project as a pilot, but collect data in future semesters. Others taught game design in their classrooms in exchange for student feedback instead of research data.