Bridge Builder Design

From Scalable Game Design wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Bridge builder.png

Build your own bridge and experience forces. Remove as many bricks as you can to reduce the cost of the bridge but in case of instability your bridge will collapse under the load of cars driving over it. Computing the forces in all the bricks the bridge provides you with feedback (some call it "critique" of your bridge design) by colorizing bricks indicating structural tension.


Explorations

The best bridge is the one that uses the minimal number of bricks. How many does it take? Hint, you will need to have some bricks under tension (glowing red) to build the best bridge. Try out different designs:

  • Load any of the existing worksheets with pre-built worlds in AgentSheets or in the Java applet and run the simulation
  • Remove bricks with the eraser tool
  • Add bricks again by selecting them in the gallery and using the pen tool
  • Create your own bridge worksheets - be sure to include tunnels at each end of the road so that cars and trucks can be generated and removed.


Educational Issues

In order to succeed in building the best or at least a pretty good bridge the user has to make a big conceptual shift that took human kind many years. The simulation supports this because unlike a physical artifact it visibly illustrates mechanical forces. This kind of computational feedback/critique, after some time, encourages to abandon their first design. Most people playing with this simulation start with removing vertical slices. This leads to a good but not optimal design. In essence this is a Greek bridge design. Optimal bridges require some kind of arch design. This is what the Romans learned. In this Greek to Roman design context this simulation could be linked to a number of educational issues including: architecture, physics, design, history, geometry, algebra, calculus, etc. Ideally these links would be captured in a medium such as the Web allowing the learner to follow some of these dimensions. Educational tidbits. One thing we learned with this simulation is that constructionism can be more effective when used in some DEconstrutivist context. Learning about something by building things from scratch can be extremely powerful but also frustrating to the point where learners give up. In the case of the bridge builder people seem to be learning just as much if not more by REMOVING elements of a design. Combined with the "force" feedback most of the users we observed eventually migrated to arch designs. This process could be aided with some instructionist tools.


Computational Thinking Patterns

  • Generate: Tunnels generate cars and trucks.
  • Absorb: Tunnels absorb (delete) cars and trucks.
  • Distributed Computation/Diffusion: This is a completely distributed model of computation. Traditional approaches (e.g., finite elements) are based on the notion of one global equation matrix. We wanted to have a more decentralized model in which every brick would be able to compute it's contribution to the stability of a construction that it is part of. After all, physical bricks do not communicate with all other bricks of a bridge either with the goal of setting up a global equation. Bricks take into consideration things on top of them that could push them down, things on their side, e.g., to which they could be glued, and things below them that could support them. These forces are communicated localy in diffusion processes.


Standards

ISTE National Educational Technology Standards

  • Creativity and Innovation:
    • use models and simulations to explore complex systems and issues

NCTM Math Standards

  • Process standards
    • problem solving
    • connections

NTSA Science Standards

  • Content standards: physical science
    • forces and motion
  • History of science

Sample Bridge Builder Lesson Plans


Acknowledgements